do sharp printers need ps to print from linux

PCL versus PS is a VHS versus Betamax thing. If the printer understands both PCL and postscript, the manufacturer will supply drivers to do each translation. That driver then translates those generic commands into specific commands for the brand of the printer. PCL and PS are printer page description languages.Ī Windows application uses a graphic description language to talk to the Windows driver for a printer. It seems like for our environment, LPR would be the default option but not confident.Ĭan anyone help me comprehend this instead of it just being one of those things you accept and try until something works? Thanks in advanced! Now as for RAW and LPR, I get how they operate different but don't understand why/when they would matter if that makes any sense. We print mostly word documents so things dont need to be of a high quality nor identical from printer to printer. We are running mostly Windows 7 64bit with a small margin running Windows 10 64bit and mostly print to Xerox machines. It also seems that PS is intended for Adobe products and you might have issues printing from other projects. I've done some quick reading but still not quite sure whether we should be picking PCL6 or PS and RAW vs LPR.įrom what I gather, PCL and PS drivers can differ by speed, quality and efficiency.

To take it one step further, I've noticed that some of our network printers are set up with the port set to RAW and others even same model set to LPR. We've had some printer issues in the past from printing random symbols or short descriptive error print outs. We have a print server with multiple types of printers and often find myself scratching my head if I should pick the PCL6 or PS version of the driver. I know there are several postings about this topic but hoping I could get a more definitive answer in layman terms.

Do sharp printers need ps to print from linux